Showing posts with label oklahoma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oklahoma. Show all posts

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Judge Delays Enforcement of Anti-Choice Okla. Law

Enforcement of an anti-choice Oklahoma law set to take effect on November 1st has been delayed by a temporary restraining order granted Monday. Oklahoma County District Court Judge Twyla Mason Gray's order delays enforcement of the law to December 4th so she can "look further into the case," according to Women's E-News.

The law in question will require doctors to report extensive information about each abortion performed in the state, which will then be published on government websites. The questionnaire will ultimately be posted on the Oklahoma State Department of Health website and includes information as detailed as a woman's reason for an abortion, her age, the date the abortion, and the total number of previous pregnancies.

Though supporters of the law argue that the omission of a woman's name and address preserves her right to privacy, opponents assert that it would be possible to identify a woman from a small town from the information to be published. The law is also the first in the nation to ban sex-selective abortion.

A lawsuit was filed earlier this month by Wanda Stapleton, a former Oklahoma state representative, and Lora Joyce Davis, a resident of Shawnee, Oklahoma. The suit, filed on the plaintiffs' behalf by the Center for Reproductive Rights, alleges that the new law violates the state constitution by covering more than one topic and that it will cause unnecessary spending of taxpayer dollars. The Center for Reproductive Rights won a similar lawsuit in Oklahoma in August.

Image credit: walknboston on flickr.com

Friday, September 18, 2009

OK State Woman Fights Victim-Blaming

Oklahoma State University PhD candidate, Karen Sisk, recently wrote an article in the Daily O'Collegian about VH1 cancelling its show, "Meagan Wants a Millionaire," following a contestant's alleged murder of his wife.

Upon the article's publication, Ms. Sisk received comments and feedback excusing the murder of of Ms. Fiore (the victim), saying such abhorrent things as, "If you put your man down in public, you should probably expect that he will kill you, mutilate your body, and leave it in a Dumpster. She was ASKING for it!"

While she could have simply shaken her head in disgust and moved on, Ms. Sisk took it a step further and bravely re-addressed the issue, exposing her own deeply personal connection to the story.

Here is Karen Sisk's second article in its entirety:

When I wrote my last column about Ryan Jenkins’s alleged murder of his wife, Jasmine Fiore, I got an interesting response online.

Someone believed that Fiore deserved what she got for the way she treated Jenkins. Her behavior was apparently a good reason for her to expect a violent outcome.

News reports said Fiore maintained friendships with several of her former flames and might have had physical relationships with one or more of them.

She should have known better than to cheat on a psychopath, apparently.

News reports also said Fiore repeatedly insulted Jenkins at a poker party the night before her disappearance. She also should have known better than to insult him.

Obviously, this behavior was grounds for her to wind up mutilated in a dumpster, right?

This response shocked me. Not because I do not know that people have these sorts of reactions — I am well aware that they do. But, because people usually do not intimate them, refusing to come right out and say them.

As a culture, we tend to blame women for being the victims of violent crimes. They should know better because men will take advantage of situations to do us harm. We should protect ourselves from them.

I would love to see this attitude change. Women do not deserve to be harassed, stalked, raped, beaten or killed no matter what they have worn, said, imbibed or done. The worst a woman — or anyone — deserves is to be broken up with. If Fiore behaved in a way that was unacceptable to Jenkins, he should have broken off their relationship.

She should not have wound up in a dumpster mutilated to the point where police used the serial numbers on her breast implants to identify her.

I say this not only as a woman but also as a survivor of sexual and physical violence.

I have spent years in therapy trying to figure out what I could have done differently to avoid being raped by the first person I was ever involved with. But, it was not my fault. I was the victim of a predator. Now, I am a survivor.

When I was 14, I was a shy, awkward and unpopular girl. When a 20-year-old man I met at a friend’s house paid attention to me, I was over the moon. I did not know how different 14-year-old girls were from 20-year-old men. So, I started dating him, and he started brainwashing me.

He convinced me to lie to my parents about his age, job and schooling. He sent me lavish presents and followed me everywhere I went. The only thing I had done to get his attention was to be in the wrong place at the right time to meet him.

Within a month, the unwanted sexual activity began, and it lasted for almost two years. After the relationship ended, I successfully prosecuted him. He was sentenced to two years in prison for the two years of my life he stole from me.

However, he only served a year and began stalking me upon his release — even showing up at my high school graduation. Luckily, the police department quickly helped me get a restraining order.

As difficult as it was to endure, the most difficult part was and continues to be my father’s reaction to the entire situation. He blamed me. He told me that I should have known better. He did not support me prosecuting my abuser and did not come to the trial.

For years, his attitude kept me from healing. It still holds me back. It was something I was unable to resolve with him before he passed away from lung cancer nine years ago. It has taken me much of that time to work toward forgiving him.

Unfortunately, my father held an opinion many hold when dealing with victims and survivors of any kind of violence. He assumed that I must have said, done or worn something that led my abuser to abuse me. My father assumed that a 14-year-old girl was savvy enough about men and sexuality to make her own decisions about her body.

Sadly, he is in the majority, not the minority. I did not do anything that made me deserve the abuse I received. I didn’t know my own rights over my body. What my father never understood was that my choice was taken from me. I was powerless. But he blamed me, assuming that I could have done something different.

Fiore did not deserve to die anymore than I deserved two years of sexual abuse. No one deserves rape, violence or death no matter what she has done or to whom she has done it.

Photo credit: flickr.com/ben pollard

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

A Moment of Oklahoma Pride!

Oh how sweet it feels, to be bursting with pride for my home state. Too often in feminist circles, I have to wince and turn away when Oklahoma comes up, but today is truly a rarity to enjoy!

Oklahoma County District Judge Vicki Robertson ruled yesterday that a law requiring Oklahoma women seeking abortions to receive and ultrasound and description of their fetus from a physician is illegal. The multi-provisioned law was overturned on account of its violation of a constitutional limitation that laws may only address a single subject.

Oh, be still my fluttering heart! Also overturned were some other provisions that allowed physicians to refuse to perform abortions on moral grounds and affected their ability to prescribe the medical abortion pill off-label.

As of 3:50 today, however, the Tulsa World reports that the State of Oklahoma will be appealing Judge Robertson's overturn of the law. As things progress, I'll try to update you all on what you can do to defend the Judge's ruling.

Thanks to Judge Robertson, to Reproductive Services of Tulsa, run by Nova Health Systems, and their representation in court by the Center for Reproductive Rights, whose hard work got this law overturned. We hope it survives appeal. Stay tuned for updates!

Photo of downtown Tulsa courtesy of chad_k on flickr.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Oklahoma man gets only 1 year sentence for raping 4 year old girl

So. Oklahoma. I love you. I really, really do. I remember fondly the days when I lived someplace without constant motorcades or massive hills to scale on the way to work, where wide open spaces are ample and the word "y'all" doesn't get me sideways glances.

However.

Sometimes you disappoint me terribly.

Here's what I don't get - this guy admitted to the crime and they had medical evidence proving that she was assaulted. Whether they judge that a 5 year old is capable of bearing witness to such a horrific event or not should come secondary to scientific evidence, regardless!

Admittedly, I'm not a lawyer. But even if the prosecution didn't feel like they could make a case for lack of DNA tying the accused man to the rape, his admission of guilt to any form of inappropriate contact should be enough to keep him in custody for more than a year.

It's terrifying, that this guy with a prior criminal record (according to this CNN video, he has a 1982 conviction of shooting a man, was sentenced to 20 years for assault and battery in 1996 before being released in 2003 after a terminal cancer diagnosis) will be back out in society at large in September.

Now, I'm no fan of our criminal justice system. The prison industrial complex is highly troublesome to me. But what really burns me here is that this system, set up under the guise of protecting society from harm and vice, is neglecting to protect some of the most vulnerable members of that society - children. To me, this is a perfect example of the system's failure.

It's probably quite obvious that I'm utterly appalled. I want your opinions, though. What should have been done here? What can we do to change things in the future? Please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Thanks to Vanessa at Feministing for the headsup on this story.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Calling Oklahoma Feminists!

I know you're out there, OK! I myself hail from the great Sooner State, and though I now am based out on the east coast with FMF, I still organize in Oklahoma, have family in Oklahoma, and for better or worse, have a soft spot for Oklahoma.

Now, I know I'm not the only Oklahoman feminist. I know you're alive and kicking - and I want to hear from you! Why?

Because there is plenty of feminist work to be done in Oklahoma. Just yesterday I found out that House Bill 1595 passed the state house, which would require doctors performing abortions to submit a questionnaire giving the reason for the abortion and how it was being paid for. The questionnaires would then be held in a database maintained by the Department of Health.

At first glance, this seemed to me to be a waste of time, certainly, and another piece of red tape for women. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it's not only a waste of time - it's a superfluous waste of state resources. The Tulsa World quotes Rep. Ryan Kiesel (D-Seminole) saying, "We're going to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, most of it for data. Have any of you looked at the form doctors already fill out? I have. There is already a questionnaire."

The bill is en route to the Senate now, which is exactly why I want my fellow Oklahoma feminists to take action. Call your senators, talk with your family, and get in touch with me - vvilott [at] feminist [dot] org - and let's strengthen the pro-choice movement in our state!