Thursday, March 31, 2011
Rally in Solidarity on April 7th for Title X
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Walk For Choice This Saturday!

- "If you can't trust me with a choice, how can you trust me with a child?"
- "Keep your rosaries off my ovaries!"
- "If you like safe sex, save Title X!"
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Another Funding Cut for Woman's Health Care?
We need you to take action NOW -- TODAY. - $110 million from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative (eliminating all funding)
- $1.4 billion for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- $747 million for the Women, Infants, and Children program (WIC)
- $50 million for Maternal and Child Health Block Grants
- $1.6 billion for the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Thanks to SIECUS for this budget analysis:
As a young person/student living in _________ (city/state/district), I am calling Representative ___________ to urge him/her to vote ‘no’ on HR 3 , the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act and HR 358, the Protect Life Act.
In addition, I strongly urge __________ to not vote to cut funding for Title X Family Planning, the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative, and other programs for women and children. Abortion access, preventative services, and health and wellness programs are vitally important to young people's lives.
As a young person that votes in this district, I believe that taking away insurance coverage for abortion and family planning services disproportionately hurts young people, who are more likely to live in poverty and at a higher risk for unintended pregnancy. We should be protecting the health and decision-making power of young people, not stripping it away. In short, these restrictions hurt everyone.
Young people voted in record numbers in the past two elections for more jobs. We want and need jobs, not restricted reproductive healthcare. If you support us now by voting down HR 3 and HR 358, we will support you by giving you our votes in 2012. Please vote with young people, not against us.
Do you know if Representative ___________ is planning to oppose these bills?
Monday, May 17, 2010
Proposed cuts to California's Family PACT Family Planning Program

Governor Schwarzenegger released a proposed budget last Friday that would drastically cut funding for California's family planning program, Family PACT. Family PACT helps fund comprehensive reproductive health clinics that serve primarily low-income or uninsured populations throughout the state. Family PACT funding enables people to obtain essential services like birth control, prenatal care, STD testing and treatment, pregnancy tests, pap smears, cancer screenings and more.
For every $1 the state spends on Family PACT, the federal government matches it with $9. For every $1 the state spends on family planning services, the state saves $9.25 in future medical and social service costs associated with unintended pregnancy. Cutting funding for Family PACT will not help the state budget crisis, it will actually make it worse.
Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California is leading the charge against the proposed cuts. You can take action from anywhere in the state by calling your legislators and following Planned Parenthood's sample script. You can contact your local affiliate group to find out how to take action in your area.
In Los Angeles, join in a lunchtime rally TOMORROW, Tuesday 5/18 from 12-1pm at the Governor's Office at 300 S. Spring Street, Los Angeles, 90013. Planned Parenthood will provide signs.
If you're in California, take action on your campus! Educate students about the benefits of Family PACT and the dire consequences cuts to the program will have. Encourage students to call their legislators and ask them to oppose the proposed cuts.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Save California's Family PACT Program!
Governor Schwarzenegger has proposed cuts to California's family planning program - Family PACT. This cut would hugely impact funding for Planned Parenthood and other reproductive health care clinics and would force millions to go without reliable birth control, cancer screenings, STD testing & treatment. If you're a California resident, please call TODAY (votes are set to happen on Monday):
Speaker Karen Bass at 916-319-2047
Speaker-Elect John A Perez at 916-319-2046
Sample Script:
"Hi, my name is ____________ and I live in [city in California]. I'm calling to urge the (Speaker/Speaker-Elect) to protect family planning services. The Governor's proposed cut to Family PACT is bad for the budget and bad for women's health. Can I count on her/him to reject cuts to family planning?"
Spread the word to everyone you know!
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Emergency Rally in Los Angeles at 12 Noon TODAY!

Stand up for women's health and join Planned Parenthood Los Angeles for an emergency rally in Los Angeles TODAY at 12 noon!
Governer Schwarzenegger has just announced his intention to cut funding for family planning services - including the life-saving cancer-screening, contraception and STI testing and treatment services that millions of Californians rely on.
Today, Planned Parenthood Los Angeles will be rallying to thank a long time supporter and ally in the fight to protect family planning, Speaker-Elect John A. Perez, and to stand up against cuts to these vital services!
Where: 320 4th St., Los Angeles 90013.
When: Tuesday, January 12, 12 - 1pm.
PPLA will provide signs.
Hope to see you there!
Monday, July 27, 2009
Anti-Women "Pence Amendment" Defeated
Amid the chaos surrounding health care reform, feminists can take some comfort in Friday's defeat of the Pence Amendment. A press release from Planned Parenthood explains the importance of this victory: "The amendment, if passed, would have denied family planning services to millions of women, men and teens by restricting Title X federal family planning funds from going to Planned Parenthood affiliate health centers."A comfortable majority, 247-183, rejected this threat to women's health. Help keep this pro-woman momentum going by joining FMF interns tomorrow in a counter-protest to Operation Rescue's demonstration!
Photo credit goes to Stacy Lynn Baum's flickr.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
What is going to a Crisis Pregnancy Center REALLY Like?

As FMF blog followers, I hope/assume that many of you are familiar with Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPC). I am not going to spend time talking about how ridiculous it is that CPCs are federally funded, or how I think that it should be illegal to tell women that condoms are 100% ineffective, or that there is a direct correlation between having an abortion and getting breast cancer, as that would take hours to write about. In a word: ridiculous.
However, it is nice to see others spreading the good word about the horrors that are CPCs, and mentioning FMF in their posts! Blogger Myra Duran (a former FMF intern in the LA office!) explains her experience at a CPC, describing all of the details from the “spa-like” atmosphere, to filling out paperwork about her religious beliefs, to peeing in a
For me, the best part is actually reading the responses to her blog post, which range from full support to overt opposition. I recommend you check her blog out, as a reminder of the action that we need to take to stop CPCs!
Swaziland "Love Test"

Population Services International (PSI) has started a new HIV testing program called “love testing,” where couples from Swaziland receive HIV testing together, as a couple. Joining forces with UNICEF and UNAIDS, this program has received $3,000,000 from PEPFAR (The US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) to act in Swaziland, where the rate of HIV/AIDS is over 26% of the population. PSI spokesman Dominic McNeill explains that the logic behind the campaign is that that HIV testing is wasted if only one member of a sexually active couple is tested. As they say, it takes two to tango, and if one person has been tested for HIV, and the other hasn’t, the tested individual is not free from contracting HIV from their partner. It is important to have all sexually active members tested in order to prevent further spreading of the disease.
By calling it “love testing,” the campaign has had an incredibly effective turn out so far, as PSI has “seen a 25 percent increase in couple testing and a 400 percent in general testing year-on-year" (CNN) However, PSI also explains that men prove more resistant to testing, as a way of protecting their masculinity. PSI has told CNN that they must go to places male presence is prevalent, such as farms, churches, and even prisons. Such voluntary testing is certainly a great step in the right direction towards HIV/AIDS treatment, but of course we all know that the focus needs to be turned to prevention through…bum bum bum…family planning and contraceptives!
If you would like to see PSI's official Love Test Video, click here.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Unlocking Condom Cases at CVS
For teens and adults alike, it is awkward enough walking through CVS to grab a pack of condoms, but imagine needing to ask an employee to find a key to unlock the condom case! CVS has locked condom cases in stores nationwide, exacerbating this awkwardness, undoubtedly causing people who had planned to be careful in their sexual practices to second guess the need to buy them out of fear of shame.In a time when sexual education has been practically eliminated in many public schools, and the rates of STIs and HIV/AIDS are skyrocketing (especially in Washington, DC), there is no reason for condoms to be difficult to access.
Six FMF interns and I braved the DC metro yesterday to attend a rally in front of CVS in Dupont Circle. The rally supported the Cure CVS initiative to stop CVS from locking up condom cases. Speakers ranging from Los Angeles to Washington, DC, came to the rally to fight for this cause, and speak about safe family planning. While CVS might argue that locking condom cases is a method of theft prevention, speakers from Los Angeles who had sampled CVS stores in East Los Angeles found that 75% of locked cases were in neighborhoods that were predominantly African American or Latino, insinuating racial slurs.
Additionally, speakers mentioned how the language barrier might prevent Latinos and other ethnicities whose first language is not English from being able to buy condoms. Skeptics of this campaign argue that we take our business elsewhere, to RiteAid, Walgreens, etc, but many of these stores are not open 24 hours a day like many CVS stores are.
Locking up condoms leads to larger public problems that I am not sure that CVS understands. Unwanted pregnancies that might arise from lack of accessibility to condoms might lead to the want/need for abortion, which automatically becomes a political issue. The risk of contracting HIV/AIDS from not wearing condoms also leads to health care issues and extraordinary medical bills. We live in a society that understands the importance of condoms, and there is no need for CVS to continue blocking their access.
Friday, April 24, 2009
Clinton Stands Up For Women's Lives
And the following on Margaret Sanger:
