Showing posts with label sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex. Show all posts

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Doctor trying to prenatally treat lesbianism? SAY WHAT?!

Yes. You heard right. Dr. Maria New of the Florida International University and her colleague Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg of Columbia University are using the drug dexamethasone on pregnant women in order to prevent their female fetuses from being homosexual or bisexual. Dexamethasone is an experimental drug that is used to try to treat female fetuses with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a genetic defect that affects the hormone production of the adrenal glands and in females can result in an increase in androgens and "masculinized" genitals (typically considered to be a clitoris larger than deemed normal). It is a class C drug, which means that it is unknown whether dex can harm a fetus. New and Meyer-Bahlburg believe that one's sexual orientation could be connected to prenatal androgens prenatal stage, and that treatment with dex could be used to change a fetus' sexual orientation.

As if that weren't bad enough, Meyer-Bahlburg goes on to describe the behavior of those with CAH: “CAH women as a group have a lower interest than controls in getting married and performing the traditional child-care/housewife role. As children, they show an unusually low interest in engaging in maternal play with baby dolls, and their interest in caring for infants, the frequency of daydreams or fantasies of pregnancy and motherhood, or the expressed wish of experiencing pregnancy and having children of their own appear to be relatively low in all age groups.” (You can read the article where I got this quote here. It also has a link to the paper where Meyer-Bahlburg said this.) Now, I don't have CAH, but that sounds like normal childhood to me. I hated dolls. I didn't want to be pregnant. I can't ever remember having a "fantasy" of pregnancy. I was perfectly ok with the idea of a stork bringing the baby. That certainly sounded better than the alternative, and what I later found out to be true.

But this research has many consequences (listed in no particular order because they are all frightening).

First, the fact that research like this is even happening is an ethical concern. Many anti-abortion activists will rant and rave about how abortionists are trying to exterminate races by performing "selective race" abortions, but then here we have doctors trying to eliminate different types of sexuality through prenatal treatment. And writing academic papers about it! The ethical implications of "curing" differing sexualities have been debated for decades, but apparently have fallen on deaf ears of New and Meyer-Bahlburg.

Second, this research implies that there is only one normal and acceptable form of female behavior. And that's "I only have one purpose in life, making babies" behavior. So all of you who wanted to be play the doctor instead of the nurse, abnormal female behavior (ironic since Maria New is a female doctor). For all of you who didn't like baby dolls, abnormal female behavior. Those of you who didn't like to play house, abnormal female behavior. This approach completely ignores every single difference between sex and gender, not to mention some of the major points of the women's rights movement. This opens the gates to researching ridiculous gender stereotypes as proven science and biological nature, like trying to prove that girls are genetically predisposed to pink.

Third, it frames LGBTQIA (Intersex and Asexual) people not as human beings, but as diseased inferiors who need to be removed from society. Call me radical, but research like this sounds an awful lot like the beginning of eugenics. This isn't just the regular anti-gay rhetoric you hear from protesters at Pride, or even from some of the more radical anti-gay extremist groups. It's one thing to be called an abomination. It's another to have doctors out there actively working on a cure for you, a vaccine to prevent people like you from existing.

And lastly, (though we could go on and on) it belittles the experiences of those women who have CAH and other intersex individuals. Intersex people face a lot of mistreatment by the medical industry, such as forced gender correction surgeries at birth and throughout their life, constant hormone replacement, and being judged by arbitrary standards that are defined by those who can't understand their position. One measure of whether a woman is intersex is by measuring the length of the clitoris. If it's too big, then she can be deemed intersex and have gender correction surgery where they cut the clitoris down to a "normal" size (this often leaves that individual with limited or no sensation in their clitoris as they grow older). Trying to prenatally treat fetuses so that they do not behave "abnormally" for their gender as prescribed for their sex erases those who may not have a sex recognized by our binary society, even though they're already invisible in our world of only male and female options.

This is some dangerous medicine.
--
Photo Credit: peasap on flickr.com
Cross-posted at Ode to Patriarchy

Friday, April 30, 2010

Rethinking Virginity Conference - May 3, 2010

Hey New England feminists! Check out this awesome event this Monday at Harvard:

The Harvard College Queer Students & Allies Present ...


RETHINKING VIRGINITY
May 3, 2010
@ the Student Organization Center at Hilles, Radcliffe Quadrangle, Harvard University (NEW LOCATION)

*PLEASE REFER TO WEBSITE FOR NEW DIRECTIONS AND INFO. ON SUNDAY PRE-CONFERENCE EVENT*
RSVP ON FACEBOOK // FOR FULL SCHEDULE AND SPEAKER LINE-UP, VISIT WWW.RETHINKINGVIRGINITY.TUMBLR.COM

Brought to you by the Harvard College Queer Students & Allies.

Is there a sex-positive way to teach abstinence? Where do our ideas about virginity come from? How does a queer person lose their virginity? Does anyone even know what virginity really is?

From debunking myths to defying norms, the Rethinking Virginity Conference will feature scholars and experts speaking about gender, sexuality, and the elusive concept of virginity. For a sneak preview, check out our tentative panels, read about the speakers, and register for FREE. Come for one panel or stay all day! Chat with speakers while grabbing FREE BURRITOS at the Boloco-sponsored lunch, and get information from tabling organizations between panels!


CAN'T MAKE THE CONFERENCE?
Join us the night before in Harvard Square for a "tweet-up" and meet the speakers!
Sunday, May 2nd from 8 to 10pm
Daedalus Restaurant (Roof Deck)
45 1/2 Mount Auburn Street // Cambridge, MA 02138-5053 // (617) 349-0071

Conference speakers include:

Lori Adelman, Assistant Program Associate, International Women’s Health Coalition, Contributor, Feministing.com
Lux Alptraum, Editor In Chief, Fleshbot
Chloe Angyal, Contributor, Feministing.com
Megara Bell, Founder, Partners In Sex Education
Sady Doyle, Editor In Chief, TigerBeatdown.com; Contributor, Feministe.us
Dr. R. Marie Griffith, Harvard Divinity School
Christian Garland, Chair, Harvard College Queer Students & Allies; Editor In Chief, H-Bomb Magazine
Elizabeth Janaik, Sexual Health Educator, Center for Wellness, Harvard University Health Services
Dr. Kathleen Kelly, Department of English, Northeastern University
Therese Shechter, Documentary Filmmaker, “I Was A Teenage Feminist”, “How To Lose Your Virginity”
Shelby Knox, Documentary Film Subject & Feminist Activist, “The Education of Shelby Knox”
Ellyn Ruthstrom, President, Bisexual Resource Center
Eva Rosenberg, Chair, Trans Task Force; FemSex
Aida Manduley, Chair, Brown University Queer Alliance; Chair, Sexual Health Education & Empowerment Council
Sarah Morton, Eastern Massachusetts Abortion Fund
Gavi Wolfe, Staff Attorney, ACLU of Massachusetts
Lena Chen, Women's Events & Outreach Chair, Harvard College Queer Students & Allies; Blogger, Sex and the Ivy


Tabling organizations include: Fenway Health, NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts, Students For Choice (Harvard College), Peer Contraceptive Counselors (Harvard College), Radcliffe Union of Students (Harvard College), & Trans Task Force (Harvard College)

Sponsored by the Harvard College Women's Center and Boloco with support from the ACLU of Massachusetts, Fenway Health, Queer Women of Color & Friends, Feminist Majority Foundation Choices Campus Program, Bisexual Resource Center, and the Harvard College student organizations: Trans Task Force, Radcliffe Union of Students, & Students For Choice.

Rethinking Virginity Conference
Full Schedule


May 3rd, 2010, 10am-5:30pm
The Penthouse @ the Student Organization Center at Hilles
Radcliffe Quadrangle, Harvard University (NEW LOCATION)
Free and open to the public.

9:45-10:15 a.m.
Conference Check-In & Registration


10:15-10:30 a.m.
Opening Remarks

10:30-11:30 a.m.
Virginity: A Historical and Cultural Primer

11:45-12:45 p.m.
Debunking The Virginity Ideal: The Feminist Response To Slut-Shaming & Sexual Scare Tactics

12:45-01:30 p.m.
Lunch Break (Sponsored by Boloco)
Enjoy free burritos from Boloco, meet our conference speakers and organizers, and pick up information and contraception from groups tabling.


01:45-02:45 p.m.
Healthy Sexuality: A Workshop

03:00-04:00 p.m.
Popping The Queer Cherry: Virginity Loss, Marriage Norms, & LGBT Identity

04:15-05:15 p.m.
Toward A Sex-Positive Vision of Abstinence

05:15-05:30 p.m.
Closing Remarks



RSVP NOW ON FACEBOOK
FOR FULL SCHEDULE AND SPEAKER LINE-UP, VISIT WWW.RETHINKINGVIRGINITY.TUMBLR.COM

Interested in becoming a publicity partner or tabling at the conference? Email lenachen@fas.harvard.edu.

Friday, March 5, 2010

What is S-E-X?

Just think back to when you first learned what sex was. Maybe it was in school, maybe it was from your friends, or maybe it was from an awkward talk with your parents, or maybe it was not at all. There are multiple sources of information about what sex is but is one of them right?

The Kinsey Institute has come out with another shocking study. Along with the University of Indiana, they interviewed 282 women and 204 men from ages 18 to 96 about what they considered to be "sex". The results were not as consistent as you would expect:

81% thought anal sex was sex
71% thought oral sex as sex
95% thought penile-vaginal intercourse was sex
89% thought p-v intercourse was sex if the male ejaculates

One odd statistic was that only 77% of men over the age of 65 considered p-v intercourse "sex".
So what do they consider sex??

I found these numbers interesting because it proves there is no solid definition of "sex". I've always been taught (mostly by my peers) that penis in vagina or anus is sex and everything leading up to it is foreplay. A common analogy used is running the bases. There are variations of the equivalents of the bases but for me: first base was making out, second was above the waist touching, third was below the waist touching, and home was penis in vagina SEX. Each time you "hooked up" with someone, you could go through the bases but as long as there was no genital coitus, you were still pure.

Looking back, there are problems with this analogy. First of all, it is extremely heteronormative. In a male-male sexual interaction, there are no breasts involved so second base is out, there is no vagina so there is no genital coitus but two men can have anal sex which was beyond home base (at least in my teenaged mind). With two females in this analogy, they get stuck at third when there is no penis. So does that mean they can't have sex?

Besides first base, there is some nudity involved. Some people believe that whenever you're naked with someone that is considered sex. In younger generations, this belief is not as wide spread. We're living in a hook-up culture where nudity does not mean intimacy and foreplay does not always come before sex. Oral sex is not about intimacy but rather a step below sex. For a lot of people, especially those claiming abstinance, oral sex and anal sex are not considered SEX. (Note the word sex in the title??) As long as there has been no penis in the vagina, your virginity is intact.

So for some people sex is intimacy, for many penile-vaginal intercourse, for others only if there is a chance at getting prengnant, and for some any genital coitus. The problem is not so much what sex is, but how to educate people about it. If there is no consensus over what it means, there can often be miscommunication. When talking about STIs, people need to know that whenever genitals are touched there is a risk of contamination. This includes, but is not limited to, penile-vaginal intercourse, giving and receiving oral sex, and anal sex. Being a "virgin" does not protect you and neither does abstaining from "sex". So don't be stupid, if you're intimate with someone or not, if you are touching their gentials USE PROTECTION!!!!

Monday, January 11, 2010

This is your brain on patriarchy

Remember the childhood brain games that challenged you to find what was missing or different between two very similar images?

Well, here's my feminist brain challenge for the day: make a list of just how many things are wrong with this article.

http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/news/2010/jan/09/roxxxy-robot-not-about-sex-except-when-she/

Oy.

Where to begin?!

Leave your list in the comments!

And...go!

Photo courtesy of K. Sawyer on Flickr